ACMECONSULTINGFounded in 1990ACME helps you find developers for new features, integrations and legacy modernisation. We match frontend, backend, full-stack, mobile and embedded expertise to your codebase and ways of working. You can add a specialist or bring several skills together. Testing, code review and knowledge transfer form part of the discussion about scope.
The developer turns priorities into features that can be built, tested and evaluated. Acceptance criteria and early feedback from product owners and users guide the next step. Technical choices take account of architecture, load and existing code.
Readable code, tests and reviews help more people contribute to the same solution. The assignment may cover new features or improvements to technical debt, dependencies and documentation. Priorities reflect the issues that most affect development and maintenance.
Integrations depend on agreed data definitions, APIs, versions and error handling. The consultant works with areas such as event flows, retries and traceability. Data ownership and outage handling matter when several systems and suppliers share a workflow.
Automated builds and tests give the team rapid feedback. The route to production also covers approvals, deployment ownership and recovery. Continuous delivery makes a release possible when needed; the timing follows business needs and service risks.
We agree the scope and deliverables with you.
A review of the codebase and dependencies, plus a prioritised backlog. The team gets a plan for the first delivery and agreed completion criteria.
Features and integrations with agreed tests and documentation. The delivery identifies completed work and known limitations.
Documentation of build, deployment, troubleshooting and recovery, together with knowledge transfer to the people who will develop and maintain the solution.
Start with the part of the solution that must change, the existing technology and the team's responsibilities. Frontend, backend, mobile and embedded work require different experience. Describe integration, testing and deployment too, so the match covers the whole task.
That depends on the changes required, dependencies and risk. A review can identify what can improve incrementally and what most limits the business. Consider migration, parallel operation, knowledge needs and ongoing maintenance alongside the development cost.
Use agreed functionality and quality requirements, then examine tests, code clarity, error handling and operational behaviour. Useful follow-up makes known risks and outstanding work visible, allowing technically completed work to be judged in its business context.
Read more about methods and principles from these organisations.
Talk directly to Alexander about
expertise, assignments and what comes next.